The "Report of the Inquiry into the Role and Oversight of Private Security Contractors in Afghanistan" by the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services is a comprehensive examination of the use of private security contractors in Afghanistan. The report provides a detailed analysis of the role these contractors play in the war-torn country, including their impact on security and their oversight by the US government.
The report highlights several key findings, including the reliance on private security contractors to fill critical security gaps in Afghanistan, concerns about the lack of accountability and oversight of these contractors, and the potential risks they pose to US military operations. The report also delves into the challenges faced by the US government in effectively monitoring and regulating the activities of private security contractors in a complex and volatile environment.
Overall, the report presents a critical assessment of the use of private security contractors in Afghanistan and underscores the need for improved oversight and accountability measures. It is a valuable resource for policymakers, military leaders, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of utilizing private security contractors in conflict zones.
Book Description:
The Inquiry into the Role and Oversight of Private Security Contractors in Afghanistan, which reported in September 2010, was precipitated by events in August 2008, when US forces bombed the Afghan village of Azizabad. This gave rise to a public dispute between the US Government and the United Nations about the level of fatalities caused by the attack and about whether those killed had been civilians or Taliban-linked insurgents. Allegations soon emerged that the attack had been based on false information deliberately fed to the US military by Afghan employees of ArmorGroup, a private security contractor, and that these employees were engaged in murder and anti-coalition activities. A key local contact of ArmorGroup, who they dubbed "Mr Pink", was subsequently convicted of espionage and sentenced to death, but was later freed.
According to the committee's chair, Carl Levin, the investigation "uncovered a significant amount of evidence that a number of security contractors working under Department of Defense contracts and subcontracts funneled US taxpayer dollars to Afghan warlords and strongmen linked to murder, kidnapping and bribery, as well as to Taliban and anti-coalition activities".
